Mikrotik wireguard behind nat reddit. 1) and now I’ve downgraded to LTS 6. You need to enable routing and allow all the addresses from all the locations so the VPS will be used as a hairpin router. As an aside what has 192. Network Overview: A lot of examples on the net show Most of them are hidden behind NAT and/or it isn't possible to forward ports to them. Scenario is that my Mikrotik RB750Gr3 is acting as the main router for my LAN, ether1 is my WAN interface which is connected to the ISP router that is supposed to provide internet to the RB750Gr3 router. Basically I want my local device on Site A to connect to the MikroTik device on Site B sitting behind a simple home router than can do port forwarding. Hi, I’m struggling with a lab config between two CHRs running RouterOS 7. I'm considering using small Mikrotik routers to make our small LAN on these sites and having the routers connect via L2TP or other tunnel to Mikrotik router at our main office. This is what converts an external connection to a IP address to IP address of the PC in the internal private network. I set it to create 5 peers, it created the configs and I can scan a QR to connect. Your router makes outgoing connections to that relay server, which is allowed with CGNAT (just like when you are behind NAT and make outgoing connections to web servers to browse the web). Really? There are no wireguard settings on Router A, You are missing the interface member for WAN… ( if ether1 is your wan, then it should not be on the bridge ) You have no input chain rule to indicate whether the unknown listening port is being triggered by MT B. 9 The topology is like this: LAN A -------------> Router A -----> Internet ------> Provider I am running a CCR2004 on a 500mbit fiberline with a /28 network on it. I have the admin password of the ISP router, so I can open any ports I want. Apr 22, 2025 · When configuring MikroTik for a WireGuard VPN, it’s important to ensure secure connection routing and network protection. Hi, I am pretty new to both MikroTik and Wireguard and wanted to know if it's possible to configure a MikroTik router as a wireguard server. 28 ??? Well, why would the gateway router care or even see 192. 1 vice Hi everyone, Does anyone know if it’s possible to make a site to site tunnel with these requisites?? Mikrotik on site A is behind an ISP router. What I'm unsure about is the topology of this scheme. To create the Point-to-point, or PtP, we will create a WireGuard VPN tunnel, and then add routes from Host A to Host B. Nov 17, 2022 · The solution proposed by us was a Wireguard tunnel between his home Mikrotik device and the Map-Lite (which will be always/mostly behind the NAT), and added static routes so entire traffic goes through the “Wireguard Interface”. 6, and the problem persists. 04) running behind a MikroTik router at remote Network B. 48. 0beta3 WireGuard on MikroTik routers refers to the integration of the WireGuard VPN protocol into MikroTik's RouterOS firmware, enabling the creation of secure, lightweight virtual private network (VPN) tunnels on MikroTik networking hardware for scenarios such as site-to-site connections or remote access. For example - Site A public ip availble - Site B working as client Muhammad Ali and 3 others 4 reactions · 24 comments 󱎖 How to manage Mikrotik from external My initial assumption was, "Tailscale already uses WireGuard, and I already have experience running and managing my own router configuration and VPS for connectivity. Can anyone advise what exactly I need to set up on the Mikrotik? Aug 5, 2024 · Ether2 is the port used to connect the hAP lite to the network. That ISP router has a public dynamic IP address. Device C (MikroTik router that supports Wireguard, behind NAT) I want to tunnel all the traffic on device A through the device C, and I am using the device B as a "bounce server". So adding in the need to reach main anav August 7, 2024, 10:10pm 2 /export file=anynameyouwish ( minus router serial number, any public WANIP information, keys etc. I suspect it’s a NAT issue, but I’m not sure how to fix it. I am capable of port Hi everyone, Does anyone know if it’s possible to make a site to site tunnel with these requisites?? Mikrotik on site A is behind an ISP router. It seems to work well, with one exception I would like your thoughts on. Firewall/NAT rules for Wireguard server behind Mikrotik Router Hi all, Please be gentle, not a Mikrotik/WG export at all, I've set up a docker running in my network. 100. 31 got to do with it, on the first post the IP address of the Mikrotik was 192. Works with static or dynamic IP (DDNS), as well as behind NAT (port-forward/initiated connection). Ideally there should be some guide where the router is in default settings and everything would go step by step. 0. 100? That is wireguard traffic, In your requirements you didnt explicitly state you wanted to reach main router subnet, and I thought you simply wanted to go out the internet. Aug 16, 2023 · We’ll pretend that the 172. 0beta3 Mikrotik routers? BT Red Mikrotik Experts 8w · Public Hi , Anyone has idea??How to provide public IPs over vpn (pptp, l2tp, wireguard)where both side Mikrotik rotuer available. The packet reaches the server, bearing the ID of an existing Wireguard connection, so the server auto-learns the bbbbb port (or, depending on the behavior of the ISP’s NAT, maybe yet another one and even a new IP address) and from now on it sends packets for the client to this new port. 1. You can get rid of the static DNS setting not required ( besides being wrong, if anything should be set to 192. I can see the laptop talking to the router by torching the wireguard interface, and the firewall counters incrementing for the relevant firewall filter rules. This involves setting up NAT and firewall rules, managing IP routes, and handling DNS and IP addresses effectively. This has the effect of allowing already-connected wireguard clients to access the wireguard port within an already connected session, and doesn’t quite make sense. 1 address is a public IP, and Host B, is behind some sort of NAT network. 2. The NAT counters stay at 0. . 168. Hello, I am trying to setup WireGuard so i can establish VPN connection have access to my local LAN resources and also have internet via VPN for the connected clients. That ISP router has a public I’ve been having problems with Wireguard (not wireugard running directly on the Mikrotik). WireGuard site-to-site is a fast, stable and secure tunnel between locations with minimal configuration. 16. You can deploy a CHR to be the VPN Server and all your remote locations are clients behind a NAT or not (doesn't matter). true For surfshark customers, in case of scenario B, the following 2 lines are needed: /ip firewall mangle add action=mark-connection chain=prerouting new-connection-mark=VPN passthrough=yes /ip firewall mangle add action=change-mss chain=forward new-mss=1360 protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn tcp-mss=1453-65535 I hope i was helpful If both your router and the external client device are behind NAT (CGNAT is NAT), then a relay server on the internet would be required. WireGuard on MikroTik routers refers to the integration of the WireGuard VPN protocol into MikroTik's RouterOS firmware, enabling the creation of secure, lightweight virtual private network (VPN) tunnels on MikroTik networking hardware for scenarios such as site-to-site connections or remote access. This setup leverages RouterOS's native support for WireGuard, introduced in version 7. When I try to connect to a wireguard endpoint running on a remote vps, it I have a WireGuard server (Ubuntu 20. Thankfully, it doesn’t s… This is because the WireGuard is behind a Network Address Translation (NAT) table. Problem is only connect successfully from within the LAN, If I switch to 4G I can't see anyting, VPN connects but I think firewall/nat is blocking it. Now my question: I would like to make a wireguard site 2 site connection from my LTE mikrotik or another Mikrotik site which is running behind NAT an thus having no public IP or open UDP port I can specify on my public IP core wireguard router to specify on the endpoint. And I can't find any good instructions anywhere. My firewall rules are just the default setup, and I’ve had this problem on v7 (up to v7. Thankfully, it doesn’t s… Hello everyone, could anyone advise me how to step by step when I want to set up wireguard on mikrotik, maybe with default settings but I need to connect to the wireguard via NAT. I’m getting a “Destination host unreachable” reply (which shows up as an invalid packet in a firewall rule), but only for the first ping attempt, and I don’t know why. 51 votes, 22 comments. What is the purpose of site1 in this picture, it seems to be a distraction, unless its acting as the WIREGUARD server for handshake?? Using Wireguard to access network behind CGNAT/Double-NAT (Reverse Wireguard?) : r/WireGuard r/WireGuard Current search is within r/WireGuard Remove r/WireGuard filter and expand search to all of Reddit Hi everyone, Does anyone know if it’s possible to make a site to site tunnel with these requisites?? Mikrotik on site A is behind an ISP router. ) Assumes site1 and Main site are mikrotik routers, aka need config of both. Thankfully, it doesn’t suffer any CGNAT. all seems good. We’ll connect office ↔ branch over WireGuard with correct AllowedIPs, keepalive, MTU, and firewall/NAT rules. Mikrotik on site B is behind an ISP-owned router. ua7ch, nltzp, i6lp, xfouq, nadfnu, zhmsf, j8yx, bxb2, gc01, mdeh,